(–) – Animation:
DynaMesh®-PR4 soft & DynaMesh®-PR4 visible
DynaMesh®-PR4 soft
DynaMesh®-PR4 visible
For the surgical treatment of cystocele
Minimised mesh sizes for transvaginal anterior mesh repair.
Significantly less mesh shrinkage because of reduced foreign body reaction [20].
Anterior mesh repair
DynaMesh®-PR4 soft
DynaMesh®-PR4 visible
DynaMesh®-PR4 soft / -PR4 visibleProduct rangeUse and propertiesTechnical dataVideosDownloads
| DynaMesh®-PR4 soft 1A (1) | 07 cm x 04 cm | PV520736F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-PR4 soft 2A (1) | 07 cm x 06 cm | PV520740F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-PR4 soft 1B (1) |
09 cm x 04 cm | PV520904F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-PR4 visible 1B (1) |
09 cm x 04 cm | PV720904F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| DynaMesh®-PR4 soft 2B (2) |
09 cm x 06 cm | PV520906F1 | Unit = 1 EA / BX |
| Product | DynaMesh®-PR4 soft (1)
DynaMesh®-PR4 visible (2) |
| Field of application | cystocele |
| Surgical method | transvaginal / anterior |
| Fixation of central part of the mesh | suture |
| Optimal handling |
 |
| Optimal patient safety |
|
| Optimal patient comfort |
|
| Atraumatic selvedges |
|
| Minimised mesh size |
|
| Shape stability |
|
| Defined elasticity |
|
| visible technology |
(2) /  (1) |
Applies to all product sizes
Does not apply
| Product | DynaMesh®-PR4 soft (1)
DynaMesh®-PR4 visible (2) |
| Polymer (monofilament) | PVDF |
| Excellent biocompatibility |
|
| Minimal foreign body reaction |
|
| Reduced bacterial adherence |
|
| High ageing resistance |
|
| Optimal dynamometry |
|
| Reactive surface (a) [m²/m²] * | 1.9 |
| Maximum stability (b) [N/cm] | 58 |
| Elasticity (b) at 16 N/cm [%] | 13 |
| Textile porosity (c) [%] * | 71 |
| Effective porosity (c) [%]] * | 68 |
| Effective porosity at 2.5 N/cm(c) [%] * | 68 |
| Classification (d) | 1a |
Applies to all product sizes
Legends for the technical data
* Central part of the mesh (a) Ratio of implant reactive surface area (thread surface) to implant surface area (b) measured in the strip tensile test (c) Mühl method [6] (d) Klinge’s classification [8]
