Tailored Implants made of PVDF

Reusable instruments (male)

Reusable instruments made from surgical steel for pelvic floor surgery (male)




Surgical instrument
d 5 cm
Unit= 1 set (l+r)

For the application of:


Surgical instrument
d 6 cm
Unit= 1 set (l+r)

For the application of:


Surgical instrument
d 7 cm
Unit= 1 set (l+r)

For the application of:



DynaMesh®-IST03 / -IST01 / -IST02Product rangeDownloadsLiterature
d 5 cm REF IST03F1 Unit= 1 set (l+r)
DynaMesh®-IST01 d 6 cm REF IST01F1 Unit= 1 set (l+r)
DynaMesh®-IST02 d 7 cm REF IST02F1 Unit= 1 set (l+r)

Literatur: Pelvic Floor Repair


1. Polymer PVDF as Implant Material
2. Product Design – Essential Mesh Parameters
3. DynaMesh® visible Technology
4. Female Urinary Incontinence
5. Male Urinary Incontinence
6. Pelvic Organ Prolapse

1. Polymer PVDF as Implant Material

1. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Ottinger AP, et al (2002)
PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes.
Biomaterials 23:3487–3493

2. Klink CD, Junge K, Binnebösel M, et al (2011)
Comparison of long-term biocompability of PVDF and PP meshes.
J Invest Surg 24:292–299. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2011.589883

3. Gerullis H, Georgas E, Eimer C, et al (2011)
Evaluation of Biocompatibility of Alloplastic Materials: Development of a Tissue Culture In Vitro Test System.
Surgical technology international 21:21

4. Gerullis H, Klosterhalfen B, Borós M, et al (2013)
IDEAL in Meshes for Prolapse, Urinary Incontinence, and Hernia Repair. Surg Innov.

5. Laroche G, Marois Y, Schwarz E, et al (1995)
Polyvinylidene fluoride monofilament sutures: can they be used safely for long-term anastomoses in the thoracic aorta?
Artif Organs 19:1190–1199

11. Junge K, Binnebösel M, Rosch R, et al (2008)
Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model.
Surgical Endoscopy 23:327–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9923-y

20. Göretzlehner U, Müllen A (2007)
PVDF als Implantat-Werkstoff in der Urogynäkologie.
BIOmaterialien 8 (S1):28–29

27. Mary C, Marois Y, King MW, et al (1998)
Comparison of the in vivo behavior of polyvinylidene fluoride and polypropylene sutures used in vascular surgery.
ASAIO J 44:199–206

50. Roman S, Urbánková I, Callewaert G, et al (2016)
Evaluating Alternative Materials for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Comparison of the In Vivo Response to MeshesImplanted in Rabbits.
The Journal of Urology 196:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.067

52. Silva RA, Silva PA, Carvalho ME (2007)
Degradation studies of some polymeric biomaterials: Polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF).
THERMEC 2006, Pts 1-5 539–543:573–576

68. Conze J, Junge K, Weiss C, et al (2008)
New polymer for intra-abdominal meshes–PVDF copolymer.
J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 87:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31106

2. Product Design – Essential Mesh Parameters

6. Mühl T, Binnebösel M, Klinge U, Goedderz T (2008)
New objective measurement to characterize the porosity of textile implants.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 84B:176–183.

26. Otto J, Kaldenhoff E, Kirschner-Hermanns R, et al (2013)
Elongation of textile pelvic floor implants under load is related to complete loss of effective porosity, thereby favouring incorporation in scar plates.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34767

38. Kaldenhoff E, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, et al (2013)
Von der Prolaps- zur Problempatientin: Schenken wir der Qualität von Netzimplantaten genügend Aufmerksamkeit?
Der Gynäkologe 46:469–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-012-3124-4

3. DynaMesh® visible Technology

7. Hansen NL, Barabasch A, Distelmaier M, et al (2013)
First In-Human Magnetic Resonance Visualization of Surgical Mesh Implants for Inguinal Hernia Treatment.
Invest Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31829806ce

48. Sindhwani N, Feola A, De Keyzer F, et al (2015)
Three-dimensional analysis of implanted magnetic-resonance-visible meshes.
International Urogynecology Journal 26:1459–1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2681-1

21. Klinge U, Binneboesel M, Kuschel S, Schuessler B (2007)
Demands and properties of alloplastic implants for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Expert Rev Med Devices 4:349–359. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.4.3.349

46. Iva U, Nikhil S, Geertje C, et al (2017)
In vivo documentation of shape and position changes of MRI-visible mesh placed in rectovaginal septum.
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 75:379–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb bm.2017.08.005

4. Female Urinary Incontinence

31. Naumann G, Albrich S, Skala C, et al (2012)
Single-Incision Slings (SIS) – a New Option for the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 72:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298275

39. Ludwig S, Stumm M, Mallmann P, Jager W (2016)
TOT 8/4: A Way to Standardize the Surgical Procedure of a Transobturator Tape.
BioMed Research International 2016:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4941304

40. Najjari L, Hennemann J, Kirschner-Hermanns R, et al (2014)
Visualization of Polypropylene and Polyvinylidene Fluoride Slings in Perineal Ultrasound and Correlation with Clinical Outcome.
BioMed Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/181035

41. Sabadell J, Larrain F, Gracia-Perez-Bonfils A, et al (2016)
Comparative study of polyvinylidene fluoride and polypropylene suburethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: PVDF/polypropylene in suburethral slings.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 42:291–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12899

49. Najjari L, Gräf CM, Kupec T, et al (2016)
Tomographic Ultrasound Imaging to Control the Placement of Tension-Free Transobturator Tape in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence.
BioMed Research International 2016:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6495858

44. Ludwig S, Stumm M (2016)
Surgical Treatment of Urgency Urinary Incontinence, OAB (Wet), Mixed Urinary Incontinence, and Total Incontinence by Cervicosacropexy or Vaginosacropexy. Gynecology & Obstetrics.

83. Ludwig S, Becker I, Mallmann P, Jäger W (2019)
Comparison of Solifenacin and Bilateral Apical Fixation in the Treatment of Mixed and Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Women: URGE 1 Study, A Randomized Clinical Trial.
In Vivo 33:1949–1957. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11690

5. Male Urinary Incontinence

81. Costa Cruz DSL da, D´Ancona CAL, Silva Filho WP da, et al (2020)
Parameters of 2-Dimensional Perineal Ultrasonography Before and After Male Sling Procedure for Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Urology 136:257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.004

6. Pelvic Organ Prolapse

57. Jan H, Ghai V, Thakar R (2018)
Simplified Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 25:1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.014

42. Balsamo R, Illiano E, Zucchi A, et al (2018)
Sacrocolpopexy with polyvinylidene fluoride mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: Mid term comparative outcomes with polypropylene mesh.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 220:74–78.

22. Noé KG, Spüntrup C, Anapolski M (2013)
Laparoscopic pectopexy: a randomised comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpo-cervicopexy to the new laparoscopic pectopexy. Short-term postoperative results.
Arch Gynecol Obstet 287:275–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2536-7

32. Noé K-G, Schiermeier S, Alkatout I, Anapolski M (2015)
Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Trial of Standard Laparoscopic Sacral Colpocervicopexy with the New Laparoscopic Pectopexy – Postoperative Results and Intermediate-Term Follow-Up in a Pilot Study.
Journal of Endourology 29:210–215. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0413

45. Kale A, Biler A, Terzi H, et al (2017)
Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery.
International braz j urol 43:903–909. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0070

84. Noé GK, Schiermeier S, Papathemelis T, et al (2020)
Prospective international multicenter pectopexy trial: Interim results and findings post surgery.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 244:81–86.

33. Jaeger et al. (2016)
Does the Patients Age have an Influence on the Outcome of Cesa (Cervico-Sacropexy) and Vasa (Vagino-Sacropexy) for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Women?
| Open Access | OMICS International

34. Rajshekhar S, Mukhopadhyay S, Morris E (2016)
Early safety and efficacy outcomes of a novel technique of sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse.
International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 0: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.05.007

35. Ludwig S, Stumm M, Mallmann P, Jager W (2016)
Surgical replacement of the uterosacral-and pubourethral-ligaments as treatment for urgency urinary incontinence.
Austin J Womens Health 3:1019

36. Joukhadar R, Meyberg-Solomayer G, Hamza A, et al (2015)
A Novel Operative Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Utilizing a MRI-Visible Mesh Implant: Safety and Outcome of Modified Laparoscopic Bilateral Sacropexy.
BioMed Research International 2015:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/860784

73. Cassis C, Mukhopadhyay S, Morris E (2019)
Standardizing abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse: One year on.
Int J Gynecol Obstet ijgo.12935. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12935

85. Rexhepi S, Rexhepi E, Stumm M, et al (2018)
Laparoscopic Bilateral Cervicosacropexy and Vaginosacropexy: New Surgical Treatment Option in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence.
Journal of Endourology 32:1058–1064. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0474

43. Barski D, Arndt C, Gerullis H, et al (2017)
Transvaginal PVDF-mesh for cystocele repair: A cohort study.
International Journal of Surgery 39:249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.006